The Butcher's Bill of Dr. Blinky
What a "get" from pekin prattles:
As for the National Review Online article, I stand by my record. The record is very clear that I did not testify that Robert Wendland was in a PVS, and the same applies for the case of Michael Martin in Michigan. Both these patients were clearly not PVS (see [long legal article reference deleted]). In all the major right to die cases on a national level in which I have testified or been heavily involved with (including Brophy, Rosebush, Torres, Cruzan, Busalacchi, Ellison, Butcher, Martin, Wendland, and now Schiavo), my neurological diagnosis and the final opinions of the courts were identical (except for some legitimate differences of opinion on the degree of cognitive functions in Wendland). So my record stands for itself.
No, it stands by itself. Out standing in a field. Care to explain to 33 neurologists why you can't prove Terri's 1996 brain scan is even legit?
To whom on God's green earth does it matter what your "record" says when you won't do your job here?
As for the National Review Online article, I stand by my record. The record is very clear that I did not testify that Robert Wendland was in a PVS, and the same applies for the case of Michael Martin in Michigan. Both these patients were clearly not PVS (see [long legal article reference deleted]). In all the major right to die cases on a national level in which I have testified or been heavily involved with (including Brophy, Rosebush, Torres, Cruzan, Busalacchi, Ellison, Butcher, Martin, Wendland, and now Schiavo), my neurological diagnosis and the final opinions of the courts were identical (except for some legitimate differences of opinion on the degree of cognitive functions in Wendland). So my record stands for itself.
No, it stands by itself. Out standing in a field. Care to explain to 33 neurologists why you can't prove Terri's 1996 brain scan is even legit?
To whom on God's green earth does it matter what your "record" says when you won't do your job here?
posted by RD at 2:12 PM
4 Comments:
Ha Ha. Cranford sneaks in this laste statement:
"my neurological diagnosis and the final opinions of the courts were identical (except for some legitimate differences of opinion on the degree of cognitive functions in Wendland). So my record stands for itself."
So he's stating, I was wrong about Wendland.
What a tool Cranford is. If he was ever on a tube, I'd yank it out myself.
Hee Hee, I like that statement about pulling out Cranford's tube. Do you think that if we had a CT of his brain that we would find anything other than straw or sawdust?
I will be working on some revelations of my own regarding things stated by Schiavo and Felos in TV interviews.
Cool blog, interesting information... Keep it UP Gmc stickers http://www.lcdtvfloormount.info/parts-for-lcd-monitors.html business class airfare cheap first class airfares belize Refrigerator coils free pop up blocker msn acyclovir prices whole sale web page Subaru loyale used prices Motherboard cpu speacils Body kit acura rsx s Czci kia sorento harddrive rolex watches Paintballing saftey blocker download free popups Comcast pop up block Free popup blocker 95 liberty classic creditcard for people with bad credit Zyban smoking vessayion
You have an outstanding good and well structured site. I enjoyed browsing through it Carnival cruises estacy vitamins pay per click blackberry 7230 wireless http://www.viagra-online-0.info Newfoundland dialup internet services patio heaters jean jackets Champion sport bra underwire Figure skating tv schedule and worlds Does higher dose of zoloft cause weight gain sony vaio pcg c1mhp hard drive Accessory cheap handbag wholesale Best sports bars gay chat Allergic sinusitis cat Drive hard installing slave Daily lottery uk
Post a Comment
<< Home